A top US legislator has cautioned that rhetoric and policy uncertainty surrounding the H-1B visa program might harm India-US relations and undermine confidence among skilled workers and businesses at a delicate time in bilateral relationships.

Recent pronouncements aimed at the H-1B program have caused confusion and worry, especially among Indian professionals and businesses, according to Mark Warner, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Co-Chair of the Senate India Caucus.

Warner remarked, “It again seems to be a large announcement,” alluding to suggested modifications to the show. He pointed out that it was unclear if the $100,000 cost would be one-time or ongoing. “To my knowledge, I’m not sure where the implementation is, but the administration did say it’s a one-time fee,” he stated.

Warner said it was common to have big announcements followed by information that was released later. He remarked, “Mr. Trump’s administration frequently makes a big announcement, but the details take a long time to come.”

He admitted that there are problems with the H-1B system and that it needs to be changed.

Warner stated, “There are areas where we should have H-1B reform,” pointing out that certain businesses have abused the program. “Some businesses, both American and Indian, use this as a labor arbitrage.”

Such actions, according to Warner, are unjust to American workers. “It is unfair to the American workforce that you can bring a talented worker over at a much cheaper price,” he stated.

He did, however, vigorously defend the program’s overall worth. According to Warner, a number of US economic sectors rely on highly qualified foreign workers.

He remarked, “There are many places where you find talent that isn’t just American.”

According to him, people with H-1B visas have been vital to the US economy. Warner stated, “These H-1B visa holders and many who went on to get green cards have made enormous contributions to this country.”

Warner cautioned that using combative language might have negative diplomatic repercussions. He connected trade conflicts, tariffs, and immigration policy to more general tensions in India-US ties. He expressed alarm about the combined effects of tariffs and attacks on the visa program, saying, “It concerns me.”

According to him, India’s standing in the world has evolved and has to be acknowledged. Warner asserted that “India has arrived as a mature, major world player” and that punitive policies might force New Delhi to consider other options.

Warner also mentioned the Indian American diaspora as a factor that kept the connection stable. Many in the society, he claimed, were wondering why India seemed to be singled out. “Even people who once backed Mr. Trump are now asking, ‘Why does India seem to be picked on more than other nations?’” he asked.

He cautioned that trust would be difficult to rebuild. According to Warner, “trust is very easily broken and very hard to repair.”

Indian professionals make up the majority of recipients of the H-1B program, which has long been a pillar of the US technology, healthcare, and research industries.

Analysts claim that immigration policy has symbolic significance for India-US relations, influencing views of transparency, cooperation, and long-term strategic intent.